Women Who Asked No Permission

Edith Stein: The Woman Who Dared to Think at the Edge of the Abyss

Edith Stein: the philosophy of empathy, barriers to an academic career, and a 1933 letter denouncing Nazi persecution of Jews.

View the archive record ↗

An artifact that survived history

A letter against silence

The letter addressed to Pius XI in April 1933 documents her protest against the persecution of Jews. Its text lets us examine what she requested without attributing demands that do not appear in it. The image is an AI recreation; the link leads to a transcription of the surviving letter.

Abril / April 1933Edith Stein · Pío XI / Pius XI

A Girl Who Stopped Praying

Edith Stein was born on October 12, 1891, in Breslau, then part of the German Empire and now Wrocław, Poland. She was the youngest child in a large Jewish family. Her father died when she was about two, leaving her mother, Auguste Stein, to manage both the children and the family timber business.

Auguste was deeply religious. Edith, by contrast, began moving away from faith during adolescence. At fourteen, she temporarily left school and consciously stopped praying. She would later describe this period without melodrama: it was not a theatrical rebellion but a refusal to profess what she could not yet regard as true.

Her intellectual independence appeared early. She returned to school and entered the University of Breslau in 1911, studying psychology, history, philosophy, and German literature. Yet she found the psychology of her time too imprecise to explain human experience. She wanted a more rigorous method for understanding consciousness.

That search led her to Edmund Husserl and phenomenology.

The Problem of Understanding Another Person

In 1913 Stein moved to the University of Göttingen to study under Husserl. There she joined a philosophical circle attempting to examine experience without forcing it into preconceived theories.

She chose empathy as the subject of her doctoral dissertation. For Stein, empathy was not simply compassion, nor was it the imaginary act of placing oneself inside another person's life. It was the experience through which we recognize that another person possesses an inner life of their own—a center of consciousness that cannot be reduced to an extension of ourselves.

To understand someone, in other words, does not mean taking possession of their pain.

Her research became On the Problem of Empathy. She defended the dissertation at the University of Freiburg in 1916 and received the highest distinction. The work is still studied for its examination of consciousness, the body, personal identity, and our recognition of other human beings (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024).

During the First World War, she interrupted her studies to volunteer as a Red Cross nursing assistant at a military hospital in Moravia. There she cared for sick, wounded, and dying soldiers. The experience was more than a decorative episode in her biography: it placed before her the physical, vulnerable human beings she had been attempting to understand in philosophy.

The Assistant Expected to Remain in the Background

After earning her doctorate, Stein became Husserl's assistant in Freiburg. She organized, transcribed, and prepared complicated manuscripts written in shorthand. Her work contributed to the organization of material that would later occupy an important place in Husserl's philosophical legacy.

The relationship, however, was unequal. Stein performed demanding intellectual labor but lacked the time and recognition needed to develop her own work fully. She resigned from the position in 1918.

She then attempted to obtain a habilitation, a qualification needed to teach at university as a Privatdozent and pursue a possible professorship in Germany. Several universities refused her applications. The principal obstacle was that women were still not treated as legitimate candidates for positions of that rank.

Stein did not accept this exclusion as a natural law. Göttingen rejected her habilitation application in 1919, while Husserl's support proved less forceful than she needed. Her petition to the Prussian ministry contributed to its 1920 declaration that sex should not prevent habilitation. Formal access, however, did not secure her a university career (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024; Westerhorstmann, n.d.).

Before she was persecuted for being Jewish, Edith Stein had already been held back for being a woman.

A Conversion That Did Not Happen in One Night

The story of Stein's conversion to Catholicism is often reduced to a celebrated scene. While staying at the home of friends, she reportedly read Teresa of Ávila's autobiography in a single night. On closing the book, she is said to have declared, “This is the truth.”

The account is rooted in testimonies about her life, but it can be misleading when presented as a sudden revelation that erased everything preceding it. Her movement toward Christianity had been considerably slower. She had read the New Testament, Søren Kierkegaard, and Ignatius of Loyola and had held extensive conversations with Christian friends. Her encounter with Teresa's autobiography in the summer of 1921 appears to have culminated a process rather than begun it (Holy See, 1998).

Stein was baptized on January 1, 1922. Her mother received the news with profound sorrow. To Auguste, her daughter's conversion represented a separation from the family's tradition. Edith continued to regard herself as bound to the Jewish people, but her decision opened a wound that never entirely healed.

For several years she taught at the Dominican school of St. Magdalena in Speyer. She translated Thomas Aquinas, explored the relationship between phenomenology and medieval thought, and delivered lectures on education and the lives of women.

Her ideas do not always coincide with contemporary accounts of equality. Stein spoke of distinctly feminine characteristics and remained within the Catholic framework of her period. Nevertheless, she argued that no profession should be closed to a woman solely because of her sex and that each person should be able to develop their individual abilities, even when those abilities contradicted social expectations.

The Letter That Anticipated the Silence

One of the lesser-known events of Stein's life occurred in April 1933, only months after Adolf Hitler came to power.

The first anti-Jewish measures already demonstrated that Nazi violence was not a temporary disturbance. The boycott of Jewish businesses, the dismissal of civil servants and teachers, and racial propaganda were transforming discrimination into state policy.

Stein quickly recognized the danger. In April 1933, she addressed a letter to Pope Pius XI, forwarded with a covering letter dated April 12. Her letter described the persecution of the Jews, warned that the idolatry of race and state power also threatened Christianity, and argued that responsibility for the continuing silence would fall upon those who were able to intervene but failed to do so (Stein, 1933/2003).

This fact deserves to be remembered: a philosopher with no political power attempted to alert the highest authority of her Church while the Nazi regime was still in its earliest months.

The surviving documentation shows that the letter reached the Vatican and that the Secretariat of State replied to the abbot who had forwarded it. No evidence establishes that Pius XI sent her a personal reply or took immediate public action specifically because of her appeal. It is also important to be precise: the surviving letter requested intervention by the Church, but it did not literally contain a formal demand for an encyclical, as is sometimes claimed.

Her warning was not made with the comfort of hindsight. It came at a time when many people could still pretend that no one knew where the regime was heading.

A Refuge That Could Not Protect Her

In 1933, racial legislation forced Stein to leave her teaching position at the German Institute for Scientific Pedagogy in Münster. That same year she entered the Carmelite convent in Cologne as a postulant. When she received the habit on April 15, 1934, she took the religious name Teresa Benedicta of the Cross.

Her decision was not an impulsive escape. She had wanted to enter contemplative life since her conversion, but her spiritual advisers had previously encouraged her to continue teaching. Inside the convent, she continued her philosophical work, composing Finite and Eternal Being, one of her most ambitious books. She was unable to publish it at the time because of restrictions placed on Jewish authors.

After the violence of Kristallnacht in November 1938, her superiors feared for her safety. In December she was transferred to the Carmelite convent at Echt in the Netherlands. Her sister Rosa, who had also converted to Catholicism, later joined her there.

Germany's invasion of the Netherlands in May 1940 destroyed that fragile refuge.

In July 1942, the Dutch Catholic bishops ordered a pastoral letter protesting the deportations to be read publicly. Nazi officials retaliated by arresting Catholics of Jewish origin who had previously received a temporary exemption. On August 2, German officers arrived at the Echt convent and arrested Edith and Rosa Stein (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, n.d.).

The sisters were taken first to Amersfoort and then to Westerbork. A deportation train left Westerbork for Auschwitz on August 7. Transport documentation confirms the convoy's departure; Edith and Rosa were probably murdered in a gas chamber shortly after arrival, traditionally dated August 9, 1942 (Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, 2022).

Their arrest was part of a reprisal targeting Catholics of Jewish origin. Conversion did not protect them from Nazi racial persecution: they were deported and murdered as part of the extermination of European Jews. Rosa was not a Carmelite nun; she lived and helped at the convent.

The Identity the Executioner Tried to Impose

Pope John Paul II canonized Edith Stein in 1998 under the name Teresa Benedicta of the Cross. In 1999, he proclaimed her a co-patroness of Europe together with Bridget of Sweden and Catherine of Siena (John Paul II, 1999).

Her canonization also generated debate. Some Jewish scholars and commentators have questioned presenting her death primarily as Christian martyrdom, since she was deported and murdered as part of the Nazi extermination of European Jewry. Catholic interpretation emphasizes her religious witness and conscious acceptance of danger. Neither perspective should conceal the central historical fact: Auschwitz received her as a Jew.

To remember her only as a saint would be as incomplete as remembering her only as a victim. Before her murder, she was a philosopher who studied how one human being recognizes another, an academic who challenged barriers imposed on women, and an intellectual who asked a powerful institution not to remain silent.

Edith Stein did not ask permission to enter intellectual territory her society reserved for men. She did not ask permission to change her convictions or to preserve a complex relationship with her Jewish roots. When the state turned identity into a death sentence, she had already devoted her life to showing that a human being can never be reduced to a category.

Her philosophy of empathy eventually confronted a political system founded upon empathy's absolute negation. Nazism classified people from the outside and stripped them of their singularity. Stein had taught the opposite: every person is an irreducible inner world, someone we may approach but never entirely possess.

That was her philosophy—and, during Europe's darkest hours, her form of resistance.